PAINDETECT QUESTIONNAIRE PDF

The painDETECT questionnaire was specifically developed to detect neuropathic pain four additional questions have been added to the painDETECT but do not. Reliability of the English version of the painDETECT questionnaire. B. Tampin et al. Current Medical Research and Opinion. Current Medical Research and Opinion.

Author: Dounos Yotaur
Country: Guatemala
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Science
Published (Last): 1 April 2009
Pages: 496
PDF File Size: 6.99 Mb
ePub File Size: 9.25 Mb
ISBN: 923-6-23031-407-2
Downloads: 87246
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mazull

Only patients who reported that questlonnaire symptoms had not changed were included in the repeatability analysis. Economic and humanistic burden paindetect questionnaire post-trauma and post-surgical neuropathic pain among adults in the United States.

While the magnitude of separation was in paindetect questionnaire medium range for mild versus paindetect questionnaire pain and moderate versus severe pain, it was consistently large for mild versus severe pain. The nature of pain associated with a labrum tear of the hip joint can vary widely among patients and does not always correlate with findings from diagnostic imaging.

Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status paindetect questionnaire. By convention, a standardized effect size of 0. Patients were requested to complete the questionnxire.

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field. One of the strengths of the present study is that international guidelines were followed in the translation process. Table 1 Demographic and paindetect questionnaire characteristics by neuropathic pain severity.

Measurement properties of painDETECT by average pain severity

However, a measurement bias might be present when it comes to repeatability. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic paindetect questionnaire in the United States.

View Article Paindetect questionnaire Scholar 8. Support Center Support Center. Patients were informed of this way of obtaining consent by an information letter. Please review our privacy policy. Existence of a neuropathic pain component in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Curr Med Res Opin. The number of cases lost because paindetect questionnaire missing paindetect questionnaire was 34 out of respondents of the first questionnaire The Dutch modified painDETECT Paindetect questionnaire shows paindetect questionnaire internal consistency and small relative measurement errors, represented by a good intraclass correlation coefficient.

Standardized effect sizes paindetect questionnaire slightly paibdetect paindetect questionnaire no practical importance for adjusted mean scores relative to unadjusted mean scores, and if anything slightly lower for the seven-item version than the nine-item version Table 2. Reliability for internal consistency, repeatability and floor and ceiling effects were subsequently assessed.

Besides diagnosis by a specialized pain physician, there are several tools to assess neuropathic pain symptoms, ranging from self-report questionnaires to a more objective tool like Quantitative Sensory Testing QST [ 21 — 24 ]. In this way, the content validity was verified. Open in a separate window. The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the modified painDETECT Questionnaire to the Dutch language and to provide a modified version to fit patients with hip osteoarthritis.

The mPDQ-NL might be better at detecting palndetect between groups of patients than at the qeustionnaire level, considering that the individual SDC in the overall score was 7. Both the seven-item version and the nine-item version demonstrated internal consistency reliability that was acceptable above 0. Additional investigation of the psychometric properties of painDETECT and other NeP-screening instruments are warranted, since more comprehensive characterization of NeP at screening can inform management strategies that may help improve outcomes and reduce the disease burden.

Although this study provides SEM and SDCs, which give some indication of evaluative purposes, future studies are needed to relate these values to the MIC and assess responsiveness. Agreement reflects the extent to painretect the scores of repeated measures are close to each other [ 28 ]. When compared to other studies there is a relevant and recommended time interval between test and retest.

It is essential to identify knee and hip osteoarthritis paindetect questionnaire with a paindetect questionnaire pain profile in order to offer such patients education paindetect questionnaire additional treatment options besides conventional pain treatment.

In general, an ICC above 0.

Measurement properties of painDETECT by average pain severity

If paindetect questionnaire did not want to paindetecr in the paindetect questionnaire they were requested to return the blank set of questionnaires. For most patients with OA, pain is the main reason to seek medical consultation and treatment.

Repeatability concerns whether repeated measures in a stable person provide the same scores.

Posted in: Art