There are three parts to this narrative. In the first part I will explain what I think most historians believe about the nature of what they do by explaining what I was told was what â€˜goodâ€™ historians do and think, and there is no mention of Keith Jenkins. Jul 30, Â Â· Jenkins is quick to establish that History is not, Keith Jenkins â€“ Re-thinking History. Rethinking History asks â€ how do you answer a question. Keith Jenkins: a very particular perspective Full Article Rethinking History. Volume 17, Escaping the confines of history: Keith Jenkins.
|Published (Last):||20 November 2017|
|PDF File Size:||10.99 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.48 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Feb 16, Biblio Curious rated it liked it Shelves: Nevertheless, they cling to keith jenkins rethinking history belief that collective and disciplined endeavour will in the end enable them to construct a plausible narrative about, or model rethiking, some rethlnking of the past that will justify their claim to tell a plausible story about it; even though that story will always remain conjectural, provisional, tentative, and open to future disagreement, refinement and ultimate obsolescence.
Nov 22, Arash Farzad rated it it was amazing.
Do we strive to understand why bad things happened to prevent the reoccurrence keith jenkins rethinking history indeed, how to make keith jenkins rethinking history best retginking most likely? For, as he remarks in his introduction, history depends not on the past for its current existence, but on its present representers historians and their representations.
In fact, the style of writing hindered me from taking anything completely useful at first, and it took historj very begrudged second reading in order to take from it the following aspects of history for me to take with me onto campus: Sep 15, Dan Gorman rated it it was ok.
Keith Jenkins â€“ Re-thinking History. â€“ historyxpolitics
And, finally, keith jenkins rethinking history history is, not so much a philosophically-based subject, founded on sound reason, as an activity, based on the everyday language of collective experience Oakeshott. Understanding those patterns can be helpful. These very much condensed are: Whatever political narrative you place upon them.
Even the most detailed discrimination between rival accounts of the keith jenkins rethinking history phenomenon would not discover truth because both would be equally credible in terms of accuracy. Though he uses too many parentheses in his arguments, the book itself offers an interesting look at historical theory.
Sep 16, Wes Bishop rated it it was amazing. What is the conventional historian to make of the extraordinary conflict debate, dispute between Jenkins and his opponents? This book is full of information and excellent for core university courses based on studying history. Jenkins classic keith jenkins rethinking history about doing history in the postmodern world is, as keith jenkins rethinking history many endorsements in the front pages attest, valuable for its remarkable clarity in setting out why it matters that we give up our common sense notion of history and think seriously about the implications of post-modern and histtory theory for doing historical work.
Jenkins suggests that all history is the history of mind. Published February 6th by Routledge first published That the universe matter, stuff, rethiking exists. History is the written account as perceived by an historian.
While we may never know the exact proportions of what influenced past events, there are recurrent patterns in human action that repeat themselves just as there recurrent patterns of how things fall to the ground and the stars move. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. That the insights keith jenkins rethinking history with postmodernism are for the most part ancient, cyclical and repetitive.
Keith Jenkins Retrospective | Reviews in History
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Keith jenkins rethinking history Macfie rfthinking, The Philosophy of History: While I agree with his premise that interpretation of history cannot ever be completely unencumbered of keith jenkins rethinking history previous consensus, personal bias, and some subjectivity – this is to some degree true of the more conventional sciences too.
Just because we can A short but dense read on what “history” as catalogued by historians really is and the flaws in history. Arguably, events that happened way before rethikning keith jenkins rethinking history societies which brought about WW1. Dec 02, Cyndie rated it liked it Recommended to Cyndie by: At the Limits of History: Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Today we have greater input heavily weighed toward disinformation, social engineering, and psyops than before, not that intentional twisting of events past were not a regular part of published accounts only the intense effort and volume of this activity is now overwhelming.
Aug 02, Brian Leport rated it liked it. The outcome was an at times keith jenkins rethinking history and prolonged debate, in which there were numerous accusations of insane individualism, solipsism, fantasy-mongering, left-wing posturing and hectoring authoritarianism â€” a keitj which no self-respecting historian could easily rethinknig keith jenkins rethinking history it has to be said that many did. It is therefore up to them to decide which facts are significant and this choice is controlled by the meanings the historians give to their facts.
Again, a good, thought provoking book – it serves its purpose in getting you to think about the seeming “certainty” of history in a new way.
I enjoy political narratives too. Jenkins’ ‘Rethinking History’ was a very quick keith jenkins rethinking history easy read – something quite rare amongst books on keith jenkins rethinking history.
Any contemporary consensus can only be arrived at when one dominant voice or set of voices silences others, either by means of overt power or covert histoy. This he does by trying to promote in history the rethikning openness advocated by Derrida and other postmodern philosophers.