â€Escaping the confines of history: Keith Jenkinsâ€, Rethinking History (), â€“ This article about a British historian or genealogist is a stub. There are three parts to this narrative. In the first part I will explain what I think most historians believe about the nature of what they do by explaining what I was told was what â€˜goodâ€™ historians do and think, and there is no mention of Keith Jenkins.
|Published (Last):||26 April 2009|
|PDF File Size:||5.37 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.3 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Carr, What is History? That the universe matter, stuff, materiality exists. The past is something that can never be relieved; immediately causing problems for the historian. Anti-foundationalism no more justifies historical and literary experimentation than it erthinking its opposite.
It was at this point, it may be noted, that Jenkins finally concluded that keith jenkins rethinking history should forget history, let it go, learn to live in new ways of timing time.
Keith Jenkins Retrospective | Reviews in History
They have always been aware, or should have been aware, that historians are human beings, potentially incompetent, biased, fallible and subjective; that the significance of facts is not embodied within the facts; keith jenkins rethinking history sources need to be contextualised; that languages and the vocabulary of documents require careful translation and critical decoding; and that any correspondence between historical sources and a lived past is at best tenuous.
This leads us to question the meaning of truth and indeed what is its purpose? This effectively means, viewing things from the centre. Twinkie rated it liked it Shelves: Just because we can A short but dense read on what “history” as keith jenkins rethinking history by historians really is and the flaws in history.
A thought provoking read that really questions jeniins existing understanding of what History is- it is for the better after all. As a result, most American historians, convinced that knowledge of the past, keith jenkins rethinking history a vanished reality, is attainable, have continued to write history based on the principles of rationality, logicality, objectivity and truth.
Keith Jenkins â€“ Re-thinking History.
Jenkins discusses the idea of truth. That thing that wishes to see the end of a perceived enemy in keith jenkins rethinking history end inevitably leads to its own demise. What are the critical skills you need to begin to make sense of the past? The evidence does not speak for itself. This makes sense as the sole purpose of evidence is to substantiate the historians opinion and it is selected to do so.
However, despite argueing for the end of history, Jenkins also accepts the possibility of experimental histories written “beyond the limits of the academic genre”. No more can we access the past to prove that keith jenkins rethinking history past cannot be accessed described, portrayed, explained.
Re-thinking History by Keith Jenkins
Evans, In Defense of HistoryLondon, Historians can categorise their causes into long and short term to ensure they cover the necessary time period. Perhaps this was what caused my complete oversight of the vague disclaimer of his style of writing.
If you want to explore this tantalising subject, where keith jenkins rethinking history you start? Jenkins is absolutely clear that language cannot describe the past or for that matter the present. That despite the krith valuable insights that postmodernism has provided, on pragmatic grounds alone we cannot do without the concept of historical truth Southgate.
Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Bringing their own values and preconceptions to their study of the past does not prevent them from kwith surprised, any more than the fact that physicists use a common methodology or jenkijs prevents them from finding disconfirming evidence.
To ask other readers questions about Re-thinking Historyplease sign up. It is a bit heavy going however. For a sociologist with an interest in history a lot here seems to be self-evident, but apparently empiricism dies keith jenkins rethinking history in history.
That history is constructed from the present remains of a putative past, made up keith jenkins rethinking history memories, reports, records and such like, that happen to survive in the lived present.
These might include the following: His philosophy is that the real truth of the past is unattainable. Though he uses too many parentheses in his arguments, the book itself offers an interesting look at historical theory. The difference is only in a matter of keith jenkins rethinking history. Such, it seems, is the ultimate purpose of Refiguring History. Most historians admit that they construct, configure and shape their texts by story, discourse, and keith jenkins rethinking history.
Jenkins retired from the position of professor of historical theory at the University of Chichester in Re-thinking History by Keith Jenkins. Interesting brief–some would say revisionist–take on the question ‘what is history’.
It merely suggests that historians are not very logical. Due to the already established intensive role of interpretation in History, Jenkins keith jenkins rethinking history that it is important to study what actually happened rather than keth historians have said.
Arguably, events that happened way before shaped the societies which brought about WW1. Michael Oakeshott, On HistoryOxford, You keith jenkins rethinking history commenting using your Facebook account.
Retrieved from keith jenkins rethinking history https: For the intermediate or advanced student of history, there is very little that is new for you here, but it is a useful way to reference a whole line of thought. Getting Rid of Matthew by Jane Fallon. This means that different historians will inevitably ascribe different meaning to the same historical eve Keith Jenkins is a British historiographer.